The statement is "The country which receives culture from abroad without having anything to give in return ,and the country which aims to impose its culture on another,without accepting anything in return,will both suffer from this lack of reciprocity"
I completely agree with this note.I guess that lack of reciprocity make people suffer even though they think contrary.
By the way, Portugueses' arrival in Brazil proves this point.They've imposed their religion, clothes and even more things on indians,that couldn't do nothing.However,on the other side east countries don 't take any influence from abroad,keeping it culture pratically intact .
As he has mentioned both suffer because reciprocity is the base of good relationships and If there's no reciprocity there's no development.
thanks for all