In the United States there's an federal agency that has the responsability of protection of forests, since if they grow a lot. There's a possibilty that a wildfire happens and brings destructive consequences.
Firstly, this this agency agencies have the purpose of develop(?) burning studying controlled controled fires to prevent more dangerous wildfires that could possible happen (in the future). However, this process has to be really well stuctured, and done by forest professionals.
A lot of new ideas of how to control wildfires need to be considered, for example using mechanical cleaning or even goats to graze clean the ground in the forest, this these new methods can be both more safe and economically viable (or... safe and cost effective).
There was an episode of a controled fire that went wrong and left four hundred families without home, despite, and not only that, it brought a lot of destruction to the city.
It's evident that this question brings another one, that of how safe and necessary it is to control the potencial danger to human beings.
There's – in academical papers, you should use “there is” whenever you can.
I just parsed the text in haste essentially for grammar and punctuaction, it was not examined in detail. Not about coherence, for example. So, the real improvement of it, the major adjustment will come from our fellow contributors from the Forum.
Well, I did little, but it´s already a beggining. See you around.